How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Phones
  3. Bea-Fon SL260 LTE
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Bea-Fon SL260 LTE

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the SL260 LTE — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Bea-Fon SL260 LTE
Bea-Fon · 2023
SL260 LTE
2.2″800 mAh
approx. price≈ $55

Alternatives to the SL260 LTE

Nokia 105 4G 2023
1
Nokia · 2023105 4G 2023
3.5
9% cheaper ≈ $50
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 800 mAh
  • Dual SIM
  • Screen size 1.8″ vs 2.2″
  • Weight 93 g vs 90 g
AGM M9
2
AGM · 2024M9
4.9
Same price ≈ $55
  • Battery capacity 1,000 mAh vs 800 mAh
  • Dual SIM
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.2″
  • Weight 131 g vs 90 g
  • Thickness 16.5 mm vs 12.6 mm
Nokia 150 (2023)
3
Nokia · 2023150 (2023)
3.5
16% pricier ≈ $65
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 800 mAh
  • Dual SIM
  • 3.5 mm headphone jack
  • Weight 106 g vs 90 g
  • Thickness 15.2 mm vs 12.6 mm
HMD 110 4G
4
HMD · 2024110 4G
3.6
4% cheaper ≈ $55
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 800 mAh
  • Dual SIM
  • 3.5 mm headphone jack
  • Weight 94 g vs 90 g
Emporia PRIME-LTE
5
Emporia · 2023PRIME-LTE
5% cheaper ≈ $55
  • Battery capacity 1,400 mAh vs 800 mAh
  • Screen size 2.3″ vs 2.2″
  • Resolution (width) 240 px vs 176 px
  • Weight 107 g vs 90 g
  • Thickness 13 mm vs 12.6 mm
Nokia 110 4G 2023
6
Nokia · 2023110 4G 2023
3.8
Same price ≈ $55
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 800 mAh
  • Dual SIM
  • Screen size 1.8″ vs 2.2″
  • Weight 94 g vs 90 g
AGM M9F Floating
9
AGM · 2024M9F Floating
4.4
13% pricier ≈ $65
  • Battery capacity 1,000 mAh vs 800 mAh
  • Dual SIM
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.2″
  • Weight 126 g vs 90 g
  • Thickness 16.5 mm vs 12.6 mm
Panasonic KX-TU250
10
Panasonic · 2022KX-TU250
3.6
4% cheaper ≈ $55
  • Battery capacity 1,500 mAh vs 800 mAh
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.2″
  • Resolution (width) 240 px vs 176 px
  • Weight 106 g vs 90 g
  • Thickness 15 mm vs 12.6 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare