- dotrising.com
- Compare
- SL260 LTE vs 150 (2023)
Bea-Fon SL260 LTE vs Nokia 150 (2023)
What SL260 LTE does better (2) and where 150 (2023) wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Display2.1
2.0Battery2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
SL260 LTE150 (2023)
| SL260 LTE | 150 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 130 mm | 131 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50.6 mm | +8.4 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 15.2 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Weight | 90 g | 106 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SL260 LTE better than 150 (2023)?
- Weight90 g vs 106 g+18%
- Thickness12.6 mm vs 15.2 mm+21%
Why is 150 (2023) better than SL260 LTE?
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+81%
- Pixel density128 ppi vs 167 ppi+30%
- Dual SIMNo · SL260 LTE: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · SL260 LTE: Yes
- Screen size2.2″ vs 2.4″+9%
- Resolution (width)176 px vs 240 px+36%
- Screen-to-body ratio19.9% vs 26.9%+35%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 106 g |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 15.2 mm |
| Height | 130 mm | 131 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50.6 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Silver, Black | Black, Cyan, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.2″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 176 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 220 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 128 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 19.9% | 26.9% |
| Performance | ||
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 1.1 |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
| Software | ||
| Interface | — | Series 30 |
