- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9 vs SL260 LTE
AGM M9 vs Bea-Fon SL260 LTE
What M9 does better (6) and where SL260 LTE wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M9SL260 LTE
| M9 | SL260 LTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 130 mm | +11.3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 59 mm | = |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 12.6 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Weight | 131 g | 90 g | +41 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9 better than SL260 LTE?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 800 mAh+25%
- Pixel density167 ppi vs 128 ppi+30%
- Dual SIMYes · SL260 LTE: No
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.2″+9%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 176 px+36%
- Screen-to-body ratio21.4% vs 19.9%+8%
Why is SL260 LTE better than M9?
- Weight131 g vs 90 g+46%
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 12.6 mm+31%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 131 g | 90 g |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 12.6 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 130 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 59 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | — |
| Colours | Black | Silver, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.2″ |
| Panel | TFT | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 176 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 220 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 128 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 21.4% | 19.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 800 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
