How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. SL260 LTE vs 110 4G

Bea-Fon SL260 LTE vs HMD 110 4G

What SL260 LTE does better (1) and where 110 4G wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Bea-Fon SL260 LTE
Bea-Fon · 2023SL260 LTE
3.5Score
1 advantage≈ $55
vs
HMD 110 4G
HMD · 2024110 4G
3.6Score
8 advantages≈ $55
Higher score
2.0Display2.1
2.0Battery2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

SL260 LTE110 4G
59 × 13012.650.5 × 126.110.4
SL260 LTE110 4GDifference
Height130 mm126.1 mm+3.9 mm
Width59 mm50.5 mm+8.5 mm
Thickness12.6 mm10.4 mm+2.2 mm
Weight90 g94 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SL260 LTE better than 110 4G?

  1. Weight90 g vs 94 g+4%

Why is 110 4G better than SL260 LTE?

  1. Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+81%
  2. Pixel density128 ppi vs 167 ppi+30%
  3. Dual SIMNo · SL260 LTE: Yes
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · SL260 LTE: Yes
  5. Screen size2.2″ vs 2.4″+9%
  6. Screen-to-body ratio19.9% vs 28%+41%
  7. Resolution (width)176 px vs 240 px+36%
  8. Thickness12.6 mm vs 10.4 mm+21%
Specifications

Side by side

HMD 110 4GHMD 110 4G≈ $553.6
Design
Weight90 g94 g
Thickness12.6 mm10.4 mm
Height130 mm126.1 mm
Width59 mm50.5 mm
Ingress protection—IP54
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
ColoursSilver, BlackBlue, Titanium
Display
Screen size2.2″2.4″
PanelLCDTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)176 px240 px
Resolution (height)220 px320 px
Pixel density128 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio19.9%28%
Performance
Chipset—Unisoc T127
Chip maker—Unisoc
CPU cores—1
CPU frequency1 GHz—
Memory
RAM—0.12 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—0.3 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
Battery
Battery capacity800 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Bluetooth—5
NFC—No
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
USB version2—
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare