- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9F Floating vs SL260 LTE
AGM M9F Floating vs Bea-Fon SL260 LTE
What M9F Floating does better (4) and where SL260 LTE wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Battery2.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
M9F FloatingSL260 LTE
| M9F Floating | SL260 LTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 130 mm | +11.3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 59 mm | = |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 12.6 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Weight | 126 g | 90 g | +36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9F Floating better than SL260 LTE?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 800 mAh+25%
- Dual SIMYes · SL260 LTE: No
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.2″+9%
- Resolution (width)240 px vs 176 px+36%
Why is SL260 LTE better than M9F Floating?
- Weight126 g vs 90 g+40%
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 12.6 mm+31%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 126 g | 90 g |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 12.6 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 130 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 59 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Colours | Yellow, Black | Silver, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.2″ |
| Panel | Farb-Display | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 176 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 220 px |
| Pixel density | — | 128 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 19.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| CPU frequency | — | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 800 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
