How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. SL260 LTE vs 3210

Bea-Fon SL260 LTE vs Nokia 3210

What SL260 LTE does better (1) and where 3210 wins (8) — every spec side by side.

Bea-Fon SL260 LTE
Bea-Fon · 2023SL260 LTE
3.5Score
1 advantage≈ $60
vs
Nokia 3210
Nokia · 20243210
3.6Score
8 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
2.0Display2.1
2.0Battery2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

SL260 LTE3210
59 × 13012.652 × 12213.1
SL260 LTE3210Difference
Height130 mm122 mm+8 mm
Width59 mm52 mm+7 mm
Thickness12.6 mm13.1 mm−0.5 mm
Weight90 g86 g+4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is SL260 LTE better than 3210?

  1. Thickness12.6 mm vs 13.1 mm+4%

Why is 3210 better than SL260 LTE?

  1. Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+81%
  2. Pixel density128 ppi vs 167 ppi+30%
  3. Dual SIMNo · SL260 LTE: Yes
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · SL260 LTE: Yes
  5. Screen size2.2″ vs 2.4″+9%
  6. Weight90 g vs 86 g+4%
  7. Screen-to-body ratio19.9% vs 28.1%+41%
  8. Resolution (width)176 px vs 240 px+36%
Specifications

Side by side

Nokia 3210Nokia 3210≈ $753.6
Design
Weight90 g86 g
Thickness12.6 mm13.1 mm
Height130 mm122 mm
Width59 mm52 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Plastic
ColoursSilver, BlackScuba Blue, Y2K Gold, Grunge Black
Display
Screen size2.2″2.4″
PanelLCDTFT
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)176 px240 px
Resolution (height)220 px320 px
Pixel density128 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio19.9%28.1%
Performance
Chipset—Unisoc T107
Chip maker—Unisoc
Process—22 nm
CPU cores—1
CPU frequency1 GHz1 GHz
Memory
RAM—0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—2 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
Battery
Battery capacity800 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Bluetooth—5
NFC—No
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
USB version2—
Features
Stereo speakers—No
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare