- dotrising.com
- Compare
- SL260 LTE vs 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024
Bea-Fon SL260 LTE vs Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024
What SL260 LTE does better (4) and where 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
SL260 LTE105 4G 2nd Edition 2024
| SL260 LTE | 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 130 mm | 121.5 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50 mm | +9 mm |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 14.4 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Weight | 90 g | 93 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is SL260 LTE better than 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024?
- Screen size2.2″ vs 1.8″+22%
- Weight90 g vs 93 g+3%
- Resolution (width)176 px vs 120 px+47%
- Thickness12.6 mm vs 14.4 mm+14%
Why is 105 4G 2nd Edition 2024 better than SL260 LTE?
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+81%
- Dual SIMNo · SL260 LTE: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 93 g |
| Thickness | 12.6 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 130 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Silver, Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.2″ | 1.8″ |
| Panel | LCD | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 176 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 220 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | — | 111 ppi |
| Performance | ||
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
