Same price ≈ $55
- RAM 0.12 GB vs 0.047 GB
- Thickness 10.4 mm vs 21 mm
- Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 2,000 mAh
- Screen-to-body ratio 28% vs 29.6%
- dotrising.com
- Phones
- Energizer E246SC
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Energizer E246SC
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the E246SC — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the E246SC
20% pricier ≈ $65
- Battery capacity 2,500 mAh vs 2,000 mAh
- Thickness 19.8 mm vs 21 mm
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
- Screen-to-body ratio 20.3% vs 29.6%
20% cheaper ≈ $45
- RAM 0.062 GB vs 0.047 GB
- Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
- Thickness 11.6 mm vs 21 mm
- Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 2,000 mAh
- Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
6% pricier ≈ $55
- Thickness 16.5 mm vs 21 mm
- Battery capacity 1,000 mAh vs 2,000 mAh
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
31% pricier ≈ $70
- RAM 0.062 GB vs 0.047 GB
- Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
- Thickness 11.6 mm vs 21 mm
- Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 2,000 mAh
- Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
30% pricier ≈ $70
- RAM 0.062 GB vs 0.047 GB
- Thickness 16.2 mm vs 21 mm
- Battery capacity 1,800 mAh vs 2,000 mAh
- Screen-to-body ratio 19.8% vs 29.6%
41% pricier ≈ $75
- RAM 0.062 GB vs 0.047 GB
- Thickness 13.1 mm vs 21 mm
- Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 2,000 mAh
- Screen-to-body ratio 28.1% vs 29.6%
20% pricier ≈ $65
- RAM 0.062 GB vs 0.047 GB
- Battery capacity 2,100 mAh vs 2,000 mAh
- Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
- Bluetooth 2.4 vs 5
- Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
Same price ≈ $55
- Thickness 15 mm vs 21 mm
- Battery capacity 1,500 mAh vs 2,000 mAh
- Dual SIM
4% cheaper ≈ $50
- Thickness 14.4 mm vs 21 mm
- Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 2,000 mAh
- Pixel density 111 ppi vs 167 ppi