How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. E246SC vs Armor Mini 4

Energizer E246SC vs UleFone Armor Mini 4

What E246SC does better (3) and where Armor Mini 4 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Energizer E246SC
Energizer · 2024E246SC
3 advantages≈ $55
vs
UleFone Armor Mini 4
UleFone · 2025Armor Mini 4
3.9Score
4 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
2.1Display2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

E246SCArmor Mini 4
70 × 862163 × 142.915
E246SCArmor Mini 4Difference
Height86 mm142.9 mm−56.9 mm
Width70 mm63 mm+7 mm
Thickness21 mm15 mm+6 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is E246SC better than Armor Mini 4?

  1. Bluetooth5 vs 2.42.1×
  2. Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%
  3. Screen-to-body ratio29.6% vs 27%+10%

Why is Armor Mini 4 better than E246SC?

  1. RAM0.047 GB vs 0.062 GB+33%
  2. Battery capacity2,000 mAh vs 2,100 mAh+5%
  3. Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
  4. Thickness21 mm vs 15 mm+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight—150 g
Thickness21 mm15 mm
Height86 mm142.9 mm
Width70 mm63 mm
Ingress protection—IP68
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
ColoursGrayBlack
Display
Screen size2.4″2.8″
PanelTN TFTTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi143 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio29.6%27%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc T117
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Process22 nm—
CPU cores1—
CPU frequency1 GHz—
Memory
RAM0.047 GB0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—2 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
4K selfie videoNo—
Battery
Battery capacity2,000 mAh2,100 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wired charging—5 W
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth52.4
NFCNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
SensorsNoNo
Software
OS at launchProprietary OS—
PlatformOther—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare