- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9 vs E246SC
AGM M9 vs Energizer E246SC
What M9 does better (1) and where E246SC wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M9E246SC
| M9 | E246SC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 86 mm | +55.3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 70 mm | −11 mm |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 21 mm | −4.5 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9 better than E246SC?
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 21 mm+27%
Why is E246SC better than M9?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 2,000 mAh2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · M9: Yes
- Screen-to-body ratio21.4% vs 29.6%+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 131 g | — |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 21 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 86 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 70 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | — |
| Colours | Black | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | TN TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 21.4% | 29.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Unisoc T107 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Process | — | 22 nm |
| CPU cores | 1 | 1 |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.047 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 2,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | Other | Other |
