How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. E246SC vs XP100

Energizer E246SC vs Sonim XP100

What E246SC does better (2) and where XP100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Energizer E246SC
Energizer · 2024E246SC
2 advantages≈ $55
vs
Sonim XP100
Sonim · 2024XP100
3.9Score
2 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
2.1Display2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

E246SCXP100
70 × 862162 × 14516.2
E246SCXP100Difference
Height86 mm145 mm−59 mm
Width70 mm62 mm+8 mm
Thickness21 mm16.2 mm+4.8 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is E246SC better than XP100?

  1. Battery capacity2,000 mAh vs 1,800 mAh+11%
  2. Screen-to-body ratio29.6% vs 19.8%+49%

Why is XP100 better than E246SC?

  1. RAM0.047 GB vs 0.062 GB+33%
  2. Thickness21 mm vs 16.2 mm+30%
Specifications

Side by side

Sonim XP100Sonim XP100≈ $703.9
Design
Weight—165 g
Thickness21 mm16.2 mm
Height86 mm145 mm
Width70 mm62 mm
Ingress protection—IP68
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass
ColoursGrayBlack
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelTN TFTTFT LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio29.6%19.8%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc T127
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Process22 nm—
CPU cores11
CPU frequency1 GHz1 GHz
Memory
RAM0.047 GB0.062 GB
Storage (max)—128 GB
Storage (base)—128 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—2 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
4K selfie videoNo—
Battery
Battery capacity2,000 mAh1,800 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth55
NFCNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
SensorsNoNo
Software
OS at launchProprietary OSMocor OS
PlatformOtherOther
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare