How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. E246SC vs 3210

Energizer E246SC vs Nokia 3210

What E246SC does better (2) and where 3210 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Energizer E246SC
Energizer · 2024E246SC
2 advantages≈ $55
vs
Nokia 3210
Nokia · 20243210
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
2.1Display2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

E246SC3210
70 × 862152 × 12213.1
E246SC3210Difference
Height86 mm122 mm−36 mm
Width70 mm52 mm+18 mm
Thickness21 mm13.1 mm+7.9 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is E246SC better than 3210?

  1. Battery capacity2,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+38%
  2. Screen-to-body ratio29.6% vs 28.1%+5%

Why is 3210 better than E246SC?

  1. RAM0.047 GB vs 0.062 GB+33%
  2. Thickness21 mm vs 13.1 mm+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Nokia 3210Nokia 3210≈ $753.6
Design
Weight—86 g
Thickness21 mm13.1 mm
Height86 mm122 mm
Width70 mm52 mm
Frame—Plastic
Back—Plastic
ColoursGrayScuba Blue, Y2K Gold, Grunge Black
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelTN TFTTFT
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio29.6%28.1%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc T107
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Process22 nm22 nm
CPU cores11
CPU frequency1 GHz1 GHz
Memory
RAM0.047 GB0.062 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera—2 MP
Rear cameras—1
Optical stabilisation—No
Ultra-wide camera—No
Telephoto camera—No
4K selfie videoNo—
Battery
Battery capacity2,000 mAh1,450 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Ion
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth55
NFCNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
SensorsNo—
Software
OS at launchProprietary OS—
PlatformOther—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare