How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Compare
  3. M6 vs E246SC

AGM M6 vs Energizer E246SC

What M6 does better (2) and where E246SC wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AGM M6
AGM · 2024M6
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
vs
Energizer E246SC
Energizer · 2024E246SC
2 advantages≈ $55
2.0Display2.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

M6E246SC
61.9 × 14219.870 × 8621
M6E246SCDifference
Height142 mm86 mm+56 mm
Width61.9 mm70 mm−8.1 mm
Thickness19.8 mm21 mm−1.2 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is M6 better than E246SC?

  1. Battery capacity2,500 mAh vs 2,000 mAh+25%
  2. Thickness19.8 mm vs 21 mm+6%

Why is E246SC better than M6?

  1. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · M6: Yes
  2. Screen-to-body ratio20.3% vs 29.6%+46%
Specifications

Side by side

AGM M6AGM M6≈ $654.0
Design
Weight195 g—
Thickness19.8 mm21 mm
Height142 mm86 mm
Width61.9 mm70 mm
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
ColoursBlackGray
Display
Screen size2.4″2.4″
PanelFarb-DisplayTN TFT
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)240 px240 px
Resolution (height)320 px320 px
Pixel density167 ppi167 ppi
Refresh rate—60 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio20.3%29.6%
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T107Unisoc T107
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Process—22 nm
CPU cores11
CPU frequency1 GHz1 GHz
Memory
RAM—0.047 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera0.3 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Telephoto cameraNo—
4K selfie video—No
Battery
Battery capacity2,500 mAh2,000 mAh
Battery type—Li-Ion
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Bluetooth5.15
NFC—No
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Sensors—No
Software
OS at launch—Proprietary OS
Platform—Other
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare