1
Energizer · 2024E246SC
Same price ≈ $55
- Battery capacity 2,000 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
- Screen-to-body ratio 29.6% vs 21.4%
- Thickness 21 mm vs 16.5 mm
- dotrising.com
- Phones
- AGM M9
- Alternatives
Alternatives to AGM M9
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the M9 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the M9
Same price ≈ $55
- Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Weight 94 g vs 131 g
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx9
33% pricier ≈ $70
- Weight 126 g vs 131 g
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx8 vs IPx9
4
Funker · 2026C250 Comfort Power 4G
Same price ≈ $55
- Weight 128 g vs 131 g
- Dual SIM
- Thickness 21.3 mm vs 16.5 mm
5
Bea-Fon · 2024SL270 LTE
20% cheaper ≈ $45
- Weight 90 g vs 131 g
- Thickness 12.6 mm vs 16.5 mm
- Battery capacity 800 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Screen size 1.8″ vs 2.4″
Same price ≈ $55
- Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Weight 93 g vs 131 g
- Thickness 14.4 mm vs 16.5 mm
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx9
- Pixel density 111 ppi vs 167 ppi
Same price ≈ $55
- Battery capacity 2,500 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Weight 169 g vs 131 g
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx8 vs IPx9
9
Emporia · 2023PRIME-LTE
9% cheaper ≈ $50
- Battery capacity 1,400 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Weight 107 g vs 131 g
- Thickness 13 mm vs 16.5 mm
- Dual SIM
- Screen size 2.3″ vs 2.4″
26% pricier ≈ $70
- Battery capacity 1,150 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Weight 119 g vs 131 g
- Thickness 12.7 mm vs 16.5 mm
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx9
- Dual SIM