1
Energizer · 2024E246SC
5% cheaper ≈ $55
- Battery capacity 2,000 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
- Thickness 21 mm vs 16.5 mm
- dotrising.com
- Phones
- AGM M9
- Alternatives
Alternatives to AGM M9
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the M9 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the M9
3
Funker · 2026C250 Comfort Power 4G
5% cheaper ≈ $55
- Weight 128 g vs 131 g
- Dual SIM
- Thickness 21.3 mm vs 16.5 mm
4
Bea-Fon · 2023SL260 LTE
Same price ≈ $55
- Weight 90 g vs 131 g
- Thickness 12.6 mm vs 16.5 mm
- Battery capacity 800 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Dual SIM
11% pricier ≈ $65
- Weight 126 g vs 131 g
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx8 vs IPx9
6
Emporia · 2023PRIME-LTE
7% cheaper ≈ $55
- Battery capacity 1,400 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Weight 107 g vs 131 g
- Thickness 13 mm vs 16.5 mm
- Dual SIM
- Screen size 2.3″ vs 2.4″
7
Bea-Fon · 2025SL230 LTE
30% cheaper ≈ $40
- Weight 90 g vs 131 g
- Thickness 12.6 mm vs 16.5 mm
- Battery capacity 800 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Screen size 1.8″ vs 2.4″
5% cheaper ≈ $55
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Screen size 6.7″ vs 2.4″
- OLED panel
- Weight 180 g vs 131 g
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx7 vs IPx9
5% cheaper ≈ $55
- Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Weight 94 g vs 131 g
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx9
40% pricier ≈ $80
- Battery capacity 1,800 mAh vs 1,000 mAh
- Thickness 14.7 mm vs 16.5 mm
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx8 vs IPx9
- Weight 146 g vs 131 g