- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9 vs Leva E10
AGM M9 vs Doro Leva E10
What M9 does better (3) and where Leva E10 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M9Leva E10
| M9 | Leva E10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 128 mm | +13.3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 67.6 mm | −8.6 mm |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 12.7 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Weight | 131 g | 119 g | +12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9 better than Leva E10?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx42.2×
- Dual SIMYes · Leva E10: No
- Screen-to-body ratio21.4% vs 20.6%+4%
Why is Leva E10 better than M9?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,150 mAh+15%
- Weight131 g vs 119 g+10%
- Thickness16.5 mm vs 12.7 mm+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 131 g | 119 g |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 12.7 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 128 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 67.6 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black | Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 21.4% | 20.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Unisoc T127 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | 1 | 1 |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,150 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | Mocor RTOS |
| Platform | Other | Other |
| Interface | — | Mocor OS |
