- dotrising.com
- Compare
- M9 vs M9F Floating
AGM M9 vs AGM M9F Floating
What M9 does better (1) and where M9F Floating wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Battery2.0
7.0Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
M9M9F Floating
| M9 | M9F Floating | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 141.3 mm | 141.3 mm | = |
| Width | 59 mm | 59 mm | = |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 16.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 131 g | 126 g | +5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M9 better than M9F Floating?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx9 vs IPx8+12%
Why is M9F Floating better than M9?
- Weight131 g vs 126 g+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 131 g | 126 g |
| Thickness | 16.5 mm | 16.5 mm |
| Height | 141.3 mm | 141.3 mm |
| Width | 59 mm | 59 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP69 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx9 | IPx8 |
| Colours | Black | Yellow, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT | Farb-Display |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 21.4% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Unisoc T107 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | 1 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1 GHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | — | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Telephoto camera | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | ThreadX | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
