How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Phones
  3. Nokia 150 (2020)
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Nokia 150 (2020)

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the 150 (2020) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Nokia 150 (2020)
Nokia · 2020
150 (2020)
2.4″MediaTek1,020 mAh
approx. price≈ $30
3.5

Alternatives to the 150 (2020)

Nokia 215 4G
1
Nokia · 2020215 4G
3.5
34% pricier ≈ $45
  • Battery capacity 1,150 mAh vs 1,020 mAh
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 3
  • Thickness 13.7 mm vs 15 mm
ZTE Link II
3
ZTE · 2021Link II
3.7
34% pricier ≈ $45
  • Battery capacity 1,600 mAh vs 1,020 mAh
  • Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
  • Screen-to-body ratio 40.5% vs 26.8%
  • Pixel density 73 ppi vs 167 ppi
  • Weight 128 g vs 90 g
BLU A5L
4
BLU · 2021A5L
3.7
34% pricier ≈ $45
  • Battery capacity 1,400 mAh vs 1,020 mAh
  • Screen size 4″ vs 2.4″
  • Pixel density 233 ppi vs 167 ppi
  • Weight 118 g vs 90 g
UleFone Armor Mini 2
5
UleFone · 2021Armor Mini 2
3.9
34% pricier ≈ $45
  • Battery capacity 2,100 mAh vs 1,020 mAh
  • Weight 158 g vs 90 g
  • Screen-to-body ratio 20.7% vs 26.8%
Energizer E242s+
6
Energizer · 2024E242s+
3.7
Same price ≈ $30
  • Battery capacity 2,000 mAh vs 1,020 mAh
  • Bluetooth 4 vs 3
  • Thickness 13 mm vs 15 mm
  • Weight 116 g vs 90 g
  • Dual SIM
Energizer E24
8
Energizer · 2021E24
31% cheaper ≈ $20
  • Battery capacity 1,900 mAh vs 1,020 mAh
  • Thickness 14.5 mm vs 15 mm
  • Weight 105 g vs 90 g
  • Bluetooth 2.1 vs 3
Energizer E242s
9
Energizer · 2022E242s
3.6
34% pricier ≈ $45
  • Battery capacity 1,700 mAh vs 1,020 mAh
  • Bluetooth 4.2 vs 3
  • Thickness 13 mm vs 15 mm
  • Weight 116 g vs 90 g
  • Screen-to-body ratio 25.4% vs 26.8%
Energizer E280s
10
Energizer · 2021E280s
3.6
34% pricier ≈ $45
  • Battery capacity 3,000 mAh vs 1,020 mAh
  • Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
  • Screen-to-body ratio 32.2% vs 26.8%
  • Weight 113 g vs 90 g
  • Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare