- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 125 vs 150 (2020)
Nokia 125 vs Nokia 150 (2020)
What 125 does better (0) and where 150 (2020) wins (1) — every spec side by side.
2.1Display2.1
2.0Battery2.0
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
125150 (2020)
| 125 | 150 (2020) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 132 mm | 132 mm | = |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 50.5 mm | = |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 15 mm | = |
| Weight | 91 g | 90 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 125 better than 150 (2020)?
125 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 150 (2020) better than 125?
- Memory card slotNo · 125: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 91 g | 90 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 132 mm | 132 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 50.5 mm |
| Colours | Black, White | Cyan, Red, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 26.8% | 26.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,020 mAh | 1,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 3 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| SAR (head) | 0.43 W/kg | 0.43 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| Interface | Series 30 | Series 30 |
