- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 150 (2020) vs 215 4G
Nokia 150 (2020) vs Nokia 215 4G
What 150 (2020) does better (0) and where 215 4G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
2.1Display2.1
2.0Battery2.0
3.1Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
150 (2020)215 4G
| 150 (2020) | 215 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 132 mm | 124.7 mm | +7.3 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 51 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 13.7 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 90 g | 90 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 150 (2020) better than 215 4G?
150 (2020) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 215 4G better than 150 (2020)?
- Battery capacity1,020 mAh vs 1,150 mAh+13%
- Bluetooth3 vs 5+67%
- Thickness15 mm vs 13.7 mm+9%
- Screen-to-body ratio26.8% vs 28%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 90 g | 90 g |
| Thickness | 15 mm | 13.7 mm |
| Height | 132 mm | 124.7 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 51 mm |
| Colours | Cyan, Red, Black | Black, Cyan Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 26.8% | 28% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek | Unisoc UMS9117 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.062 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,020 mAh | 1,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 3 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| SAR (head) | 0.43 W/kg | 1.63 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| Interface | Series 30 | — |
