- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 200 4G vs 235 4G
Nokia 200 4G vs Nokia 235 4G
What 200 4G does better (2) and where 235 4G wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
200 4G235 4G
| 200 4G | 235 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 126.1 mm | 128.8 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 55.8 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 12.9 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 92 g | 106 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 4G better than 235 4G?
- Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%
- Weight92 g vs 106 g+15%
Why is 235 4G better than 200 4G?
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
- Thickness14 mm vs 12.9 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 92 g | 106 g |
| Thickness | 14 mm | 12.9 mm |
| Height | 126.1 mm | 128.8 mm |
| Width | 50.5 mm | 55.8 mm |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Yellow | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 28% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Unisoc T107 |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Selfie camera | 0.3 MP | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Sensors | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Nokia OS | Nokia Series 30+ |
| Platform | Other | Other |
