- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 235 4G vs 3210
Nokia 235 4G vs Nokia 3210
What 235 4G does better (1) and where 3210 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
235 4G3210
| 235 4G | 3210 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 128.8 mm | 122 mm | +6.8 mm |
| Width | 55.8 mm | 52 mm | +3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 13.1 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 86 g | +20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 235 4G better than 3210?
- Screen size2.8″ vs 2.4″+17%
Why is 3210 better than 235 4G?
- Weight106 g vs 86 g+23%
- Pixel density143 ppi vs 167 ppi+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 106 g | 86 g |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 13.1 mm |
| Height | 128.8 mm | 122 mm |
| Width | 55.8 mm | 52 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | — | Scuba Blue, Y2K Gold, Grunge Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | LCD | TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 143 ppi | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 28.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | Unisoc T107 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Process | — | 22 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 1 |
| CPU frequency | — | 1 GHz |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 0.062 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Nokia Series 30+ | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
