- dotrising.com
- Compare
- 235 4G vs T909
Nokia 235 4G vs Tel.Me. T909
What 235 4G does better (4) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
235 4GT909
| 235 4G | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 128.8 mm | 109 mm | +19.8 mm |
| Width | 55.8 mm | 44 mm | +11.8 mm |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 22 mm | −9.1 mm |
| Weight | 106 g | 95 g | +11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 235 4G better than T909?
- Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 600 mAh2.4×
- Memory card slotYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
- Thickness12.9 mm vs 22 mm+71%
Why is T909 better than 235 4G?
- Weight106 g vs 95 g+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 106 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 128.8 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 55.8 mm | 44 mm |
| Colours | — | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | — |
| Panel | LCD | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | — |
| Pixel density | 143 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T107 | — |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,450 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Nokia Series 30+ | — |
| Platform | Other | — |
