dotrising.com
Compare
Razr 40 Ultra vs nubia Flip

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs ZTE nubia Flip

What Razr 40 Ultra does better (12) and where nubia Flip wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2023Razr 40 Ultra

5.0Score

12 advantages≈ $300

ZTE · 2024nubia Flip

5.7Score

5 advantages≈ $270

Higher score

6.5Display8.0

5.4Camera3.2

3.1Battery3.8

3.5Features6.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 40 Ultranubia Flip

	Razr 40 Ultra	nubia Flip	Difference
Height	170.8 mm	170 mm	+0.8 mm
Width	74 mm	75.5 mm	−1.5 mm
Thickness	7 mm	7 mm	=
Weight	184 g	214 g	−30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 40 Ultra better than nubia Flip?

Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Flip: No
Wireless chargingYes · nubia Flip: No
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+33%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Flip: No
Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
4K selfie videoYes · nubia Flip: No
Weight184 g vs 214 g+16%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%

Why is nubia Flip better than Razr 40 Ultra?

Main camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
Battery capacity3,800 mAh vs 4,310 mAh+13%
Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
Pixel density413 ppi vs 439 ppi+6%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,188 px+10%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 40 Ultra≈ $3005.0	ZTE nubia Flip≈ $2705.7
Design
Weight	184 g	214 g
Thickness	7 mm	7 mm
Height	170.8 mm	170 mm
Width	74 mm	75.5 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP52	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	—
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	—
Colours	Infinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta, Peach Fuzz	Sunshine Gold, Cosmic Black, Flowering Lilac
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.9″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable OLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	—
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,188 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,790 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	439 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,400 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,050 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	85.1%	86.3%
HDR	Yes	—
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.19 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Adreno 730	Adreno 644
AnTuTu score	975,461	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,645	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	—
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	12 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.5	—
Main sensor size	1/2.55"	—
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	—
Selfie camera	32 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	3,800 mAh	4,310 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Wired charging	30 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	—	83%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	5 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.1
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.4 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Major OS updates promised	3	—