dotrising.com
Compare
Razr 40 Ultra vs Phantom V Flip2

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Flip2

What Razr 40 Ultra does better (17) and where Phantom V Flip2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2023Razr 40 Ultra

5.0Score

17 advantages≈ $300

Tecno · 2024Phantom V Flip2

5.7Score

3 advantages

Higher score

6.5Display6.0

4.1Performance2.5

5.4Camera5.2

3.1Battery6.2

3.5Features4.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 40 UltraPhantom V Flip2

	Razr 40 Ultra	Phantom V Flip2	Difference
Height	170.8 mm	170.8 mm	=
Width	74 mm	73.4 mm	+0.6 mm
Thickness	7 mm	7.6 mm	−0.6 mm
Weight	184 g	196 g	−12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 40 Ultra better than Phantom V Flip2?

AnTuTu score975,461 vs 775,306+26%
RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Wireless chargingYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,645 vs 2,544+43%
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+23%
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
4K selfie videoYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
eSIMYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
Dual SIMYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
Measured brightness1,050 nits vs 893 nits+18%

Why is Phantom V Flip2 better than Razr 40 Ultra?

Main camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
Wired charging30 W vs 70 W2.3×
Battery capacity3,800 mAh vs 4,720 mAh+24%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 40 Ultra≈ $3005.0	Tecno Phantom V Flip25.7
Design
Weight	184 g	196 g
Thickness	7 mm	7.6 mm
Height	170.8 mm	170.8 mm
Width	74 mm	73.4 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Eco leather
Ingress protection	IP52	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	—
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	—
Colours	Infinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta, Peach Fuzz	Travertine Green, Moondust Grey
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.9″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,640 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	413 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,400 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,050 nits	893 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	85.1%	85.9%
HDR	Yes	—
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Mediatek Dimensity 8020
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.19 GHz	2.6 GHz
GPU	Adreno 730	Mali-G77 MC9
AnTuTu score	975,461	775,306
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,645	2,544
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,247
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	—
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	12 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.5	—
Main sensor size	1/2.55"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	3,800 mAh	4,720 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Active use (test)	—	11.6 h
Wired charging	30 W	70 W
Charged in 30 min	—	100%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	5 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.4 LUFS	-26.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Major OS updates promised	3	—