- dotrising.com
- Compare
- iPhone 17 Pro vs T909
Apple iPhone 17 Pro vs Tel.Me. T909
What iPhone 17 Pro does better (7) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
8.0Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
iPhone 17 ProT909
| iPhone 17 Pro | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 150 mm | 109 mm | +41 mm |
| Width | 71.9 mm | 44 mm | +27.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 22 mm | −13.2 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 95 g | +111 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iPhone 17 Pro better than T909?
- Battery capacity3,998 mAh vs 600 mAh6.7×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909: No
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 22 mm2.5×
- eSIMYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
Why is T909 better than iPhone 17 Pro?
- Weight206 g vs 95 g2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 150 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 71.9 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Ceramic Shield 2 | — |
| Colours | Silver, Cosmic Orange, Deep Blue | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | — |
| Panel | LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,206 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,622 px | — |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Apple A19 Pro | — |
| Chip maker | Apple | — |
| Process | 3 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 6 | — |
| CPU frequency | 4.26 GHz | — |
| GPU | Apple GPU | — |
| AnTuTu score | 2,430,575 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,923 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,868 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage type | NVMe | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | — |
| Optical zoom | 4× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 18 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,998 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 15.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 40 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 75% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging power | 25 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 | — |
| USB version | 3.2 | — |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| 3D face unlock | Yes | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | — |
| SAR (head) | 1.49 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | iOS 26 | — |
| Platform | iOS | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 47 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPhone 17 ProvsRealme 14 Pro+
9.29.0
vs
Apple iPhone 17 ProvsApple iPhone 16 Pro
9.29.0
vs
Apple iPhone 17 ProvsTecno Pova 7 Ultra
9.29.0
vs
Apple iPhone 17 ProvsXiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
9.29.3
vs
Apple iPhone 17 ProvsXiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro (China)
9.29.1
vs
Apple iPhone 17 ProvsApple iPhone 15 Pro
9.28.6