- dotrising.com
- Compare
- iPhone 16 Pro vs T909c
Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Tel.Me. T909c
What iPhone 16 Pro does better (7) and where T909c wins (1) — every spec side by side.
7.9Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
iPhone 16 ProT909c
| iPhone 16 Pro | T909c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 149.6 mm | 129 mm | +20.6 mm |
| Width | 71.5 mm | 44 mm | +27.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 18 mm | −9.7 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 80 g | +119 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iPhone 16 Pro better than T909c?
- Battery capacity3,582 mAh vs 600 mAh6×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909c: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909c: No
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 18 mm2.2×
- eSIMYes · T909c: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909c: No
Why is T909c better than iPhone 16 Pro?
- Weight199 g vs 80 g2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 80 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 149.6 mm | 129 mm |
| Width | 71.5 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Ceramic Shield glass (2024 gen) | — |
| Colours | Black Titanium, White Titanium, Natural Titanium, Desert Titanium | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | — |
| Panel | LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,206 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,622 px | — |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,764 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Apple A18 Pro | — |
| Chip maker | Apple | — |
| Process | 3 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 6 | — |
| CPU frequency | 4.05 GHz | — |
| GPU | Apple GPU | — |
| AnTuTu score | 1,871,052 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,283 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,898 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | NVMe | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.28" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | — |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,582 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 14.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging power | 25 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 | — |
| USB version | 3.2 | — |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.3 LUFS | — |
| 3D face unlock | Yes | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | — |
| SAR (head) | 1.24 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | iOS 18 | — |
| Platform | iOS | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 37 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple iPhone 17 ProvsApple iPhone 16 Pro
9.29.0
vs
Apple iPhone 16 ProvsApple iPhone 15 Pro
9.08.6
vs
Apple iPhone 16 ProvsTecno Camon 30 Pro
9.08.7
vs
Apple iPhone 16 PlusvsApple iPhone 16 Pro
8.89.0
vs
Apple iPhone 16 ProvsHuawei Pura 70
9.09.0
vs
Apple iPhone 16 ProvsApple iPhone 14 Pro
9.08.3