5% cheaper ≈ $280
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 4,050 mAh
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 60 Hz
- RAM 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Water resistance (IPx) IPx4 vs IPx8
- NFC
- dotrising.com
- Phones
- Samsung Galaxy XCover7
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Samsung Galaxy XCover7
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Galaxy XCover7 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Galaxy XCover7
Same price ≈ $290
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Wired charging 30 W vs 15 W
- AnTuTu score 790,810 vs 518,777
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
- Pixel density 387 ppi vs 400 ppi
5% pricier ≈ $310
- Battery capacity 6,500 mAh vs 4,050 mAh
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
- Wired charging 18 W vs 15 W
- RAM 4 GB vs 6 GB
- Pixel density 267 ppi vs 400 ppi
4% cheaper ≈ $280
- AnTuTu score 1,401,105 vs 518,777
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,224 vs 1,900
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 128 GB
- Main camera 48 MP vs 50 MP
- Memory card slot
Same price ≈ $300
- Wired charging 45 W vs 15 W
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 4,050 mAh
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 128 GB
- Process 12 nm vs 6 nm
- eSIM
Same price ≈ $300
- Battery capacity 11,000 mAh vs 4,050 mAh
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
- Main camera 64 MP vs 50 MP
- Weight 360 g vs 240 g
- Peak brightness 450 nits vs 600 nits
12% pricier ≈ $330
- Peak brightness 1,300 nits vs 600 nits
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 4,050 mAh
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Screen size 6.1″ vs 6.6″
- Main camera aperture f/1.9 vs f/1.8
Same price ≈ $300
- AnTuTu score 1,548,896 vs 518,777
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,299 vs 1,900
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Memory card slot
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
12% cheaper ≈ $260
- AnTuTu score 1,193,520 vs 518,777
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,384 vs 1,900
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
- Memory card slot
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
12% cheaper ≈ $260
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 4,050 mAh
- Wired charging 22 W vs 15 W
- Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
- AnTuTu score 343,622 vs 518,777
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 1,201 vs 1,900