- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy S24 FE vs Galaxy XCover7
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Samsung Galaxy XCover7
What Galaxy S24 FE does better (28) and where Galaxy XCover7 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display4.5
7.8Performance3.7
9.3Camera4.1
3.8Battery2.8
9.8Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S24 FEGalaxy XCover7
| Galaxy S24 FE | Galaxy XCover7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162 mm | 169 mm | −7 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 80.1 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 10.2 mm | −2.2 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 240 g | −27 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S24 FE better than Galaxy XCover7?
- AnTuTu score1,548,896 vs 518,7773×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,299 vs 1,9003.3×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 600 nits3.2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Measured brightness1,372 nits vs 555 nits2.5×
- Wired charging25 W vs 15 W+67%
- OLED panelYes · Galaxy XCover7: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy XCover7: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy XCover7: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Galaxy XCover7: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy XCover7: No
Why is Galaxy XCover7 better than Galaxy S24 FE?
- Memory card slotNo · Galaxy S24 FE: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy S24 FE: Yes
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 400 ppi+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 240 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 10.2 mm |
| Height | 162 mm | 169 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,900 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,372 nits | 555 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | 77.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 2400e | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 10 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Xclipse 940 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,548,896 | 518,777 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,299 | 1,900 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,889 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Yes |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.86 W/kg | 1.08 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 42 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 FEvsSamsung Galaxy S24 FE
8.98.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 FEvsInfinix GT 20 Pro
8.88.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 FEvsSamsung Galaxy S23 FE
8.88.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 FEvsMotorola Edge 50
8.88.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 FEvsXiaomi Redmi Turbo 3
8.89.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 FEvsTecno Camon 30 Pro
8.88.7


