8% pricier ≈ $80
- Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
- Screen-to-body ratio 33.8% vs 28%
- Thickness 12.9 mm vs 14 mm
- Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
- Weight 106 g vs 92 g
- dotrising.com
- Phones
- Nokia 200 4G
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Nokia 200 4G
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the 200 4G — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the 200 4G
11% pricier ≈ $85
- Battery capacity 2,500 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Weight 169 g vs 92 g
- Thickness 20 mm vs 14 mm
3
myPhone · 20267340
13% cheaper ≈ $65
- Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
- Battery capacity 1,400 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
13% cheaper ≈ $65
- Battery capacity 2,500 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Screen size 5″ vs 2.4″
- Selfie camera 2 MP vs 0.3 MP
- Dual SIM
27% cheaper ≈ $55
- Battery capacity 1,500 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Main camera 1 MP vs 2 MP
- Weight 119 g vs 92 g
13% cheaper ≈ $65
- Battery capacity 3,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Screen size 5″ vs 2.4″
- Screen-to-body ratio 72.4% vs 28%
- Weight 162 g vs 92 g
- Bluetooth 4.2 vs 5
9% cheaper ≈ $70
- Thickness 12.7 mm vs 14 mm
- Battery capacity 1,150 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Weight 119 g vs 92 g
35% cheaper ≈ $50
- Battery capacity 2,500 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Weight 169 g vs 92 g
- Thickness 20 mm vs 14 mm
15% pricier ≈ $85
- Battery capacity 2,500 mAh vs 1,450 mAh
- Weight 169 g vs 92 g
- Thickness 20 mm vs 14 mm