- dotrising.com
- Compare
- A930 GPS 4G Senior vs 200 4G
Aligator A930 GPS 4G Senior vs Nokia 200 4G
What A930 GPS 4G Senior does better (3) and where 200 4G wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Camera2.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
A930 GPS 4G Senior200 4G
| A930 GPS 4G Senior | 200 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 143 mm | 126.1 mm | +16.9 mm |
| Width | 58 mm | 50.5 mm | +7.5 mm |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 14 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 95 g | 92 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is A930 GPS 4G Senior better than 200 4G?
- Battery capacity1,700 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+17%
- Screen size2.8″ vs 2.4″+17%
- Thickness13.6 mm vs 14 mm+3%
Why is 200 4G better than A930 GPS 4G Senior?
- Weight95 g vs 92 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 95 g | 92 g |
| Thickness | 13.6 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 143 mm | 126.1 mm |
| Width | 58 mm | 50.5 mm |
| Colours | — | Black, Blue, Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 2.4″ |
| Panel | — | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | — | 167 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 28% |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Selfie camera | — | 0.3 MP |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,700 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Nokia OS |
| Platform | — | Other |
