Same price ≈ $770
- Battery capacity 6,500 mAh vs 5,300 mAh
- RAM 16 GB vs 12 GB
- AnTuTu score 1,631,366 vs 1,497,741
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Telephoto camera
- dotrising.com
- Phones
- Huawei Mate 70
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Huawei Mate 70
10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the Mate 70 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Mate 70
4% cheaper ≈ $750
- AnTuTu score 2,995,695 vs 1,497,741
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,637 vs 4,981
- Battery capacity 6,100 mAh vs 5,300 mAh
- Weight 213 g vs 203 g
- Thickness 8.4 mm vs 7.8 mm
Same price ≈ $790
- RAM 24 GB vs 12 GB
- AnTuTu score 1,821,158 vs 1,497,741
- Battery capacity 6,000 mAh vs 5,300 mAh
- Wireless charging
- Peak brightness 1,500 nits vs 2,500 nits
9% cheaper ≈ $710
- AnTuTu score 2,014,262 vs 1,497,741
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 7,060 vs 4,981
- Wired charging 90 W vs 66 W
- Battery capacity 5,000 mAh vs 5,300 mAh
- Weight 230 g vs 203 g
Same price ≈ $770
- Wired charging 120 W vs 66 W
- Peak brightness 6,000 nits vs 2,500 nits
- Battery capacity 5,500 mAh vs 5,300 mAh
- AnTuTu score 1,114,911 vs 1,497,741
- Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
5% pricier ≈ $820
- AnTuTu score 2,690,491 vs 1,497,741
- RAM 24 GB vs 12 GB
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 9,278 vs 4,981
- Optical zoom 3× vs 5×
- Weight 210 g vs 203 g
10% cheaper ≈ $700
- RAM 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Battery capacity 5,600 mAh vs 5,300 mAh
- Wired charging 80 W vs 66 W
- Peak brightness 1,200 nits vs 2,500 nits
- Telephoto camera
12% cheaper ≈ $690
- RAM 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Wired charging 80 W vs 66 W
- Selfie camera 32 MP vs 13 MP
- Peak brightness 1,250 nits vs 2,500 nits
- Battery capacity 5,050 mAh vs 5,300 mAh
Same price ≈ $800
- AnTuTu score 2,048,465 vs 1,497,741
- Battery capacity 6,200 mAh vs 5,300 mAh
- RAM 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Peak brightness 1,200 nits vs 2,500 nits
- Optical zoom 3.5× vs 5×
15% cheaper ≈ $660
- AnTuTu score 2,152,790 vs 1,497,741
- RAM 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 6,311 vs 4,981
- Optical zoom 3.7× vs 5×
- Weight 229 g vs 203 g