dotrising.com
Compare
Mate 70 vs X100 Ultra

Huawei Mate 70 vs Vivo X100 Ultra

What Mate 70 does better (6) and where X100 Ultra wins (16) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2024Mate 70

9.3Score

6 advantages≈ $780

Vivo · 2024X100 Ultra

9.5Score

16 advantages≈ $660

Higher score

8.5Display9.0

7.7Performance8.7

9.5Camera9.7

9.0Battery7.8

9.3Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Mate 70X100 Ultra

	Mate 70	X100 Ultra	Difference
Height	160.9 mm	164.1 mm	−3.2 mm
Width	75.9 mm	75.6 mm	+0.3 mm
Thickness	7.8 mm	9.2 mm	−1.4 mm
Weight	203 g	229 g	−26 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Mate 70 better than X100 Ultra?

Optical zoom5× vs 3.7×+35%
Weight203 g vs 229 g+13%
Wireless charging power50 W vs 30 W+67%
Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
Main camera aperturef/1.4 vs f/1.8+29%
Thickness7.8 mm vs 9.2 mm+18%

Why is X100 Ultra better than Mate 70?

AnTuTu score1,497,741 vs 2,152,790+44%
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,981 vs 6,311+27%
Battery capacity5,300 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+4%
Wired charging66 W vs 80 W+21%
Selfie camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+32%
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
Peak brightness2,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+20%
Pixel density440 ppi vs 517 ppi+18%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx9+12%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei Mate 70≈ $7809.3	Vivo X100 Ultra≈ $6609.5
Design
Weight	203 g	229 g
Thickness	7.8 mm	9.2 mm
Height	160.9 mm	164.1 mm
Width	75.9 mm	75.6 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	IP69
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx9
Glass protection	Huawei Kunlun Glass 2	—
Colours	Black, Purple, White, Green	Titanium, White, Grey
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	LTPO OLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,216 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,688 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	440 ppi	517 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	2,500 nits	3,000 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,801 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	89.1%	89.8%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Kirin 9020	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	7 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.5 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 920	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	1,497,741	2,152,790
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,981	6,311
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	4,934
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.4	f/1.8
Main sensor size	—	1/0.98"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	5×	3.7×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	13 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,300 mAh	5,500 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Si/C
Active use (test)	—	12.9 h
Wired charging	66 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	—	65%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	50 W	30 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.2	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.1	3.2
Video output	Yes	Yes
Satellite messaging	Yes	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-26.2 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display, ultrasonic
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.3	Android 14
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android
Interface	—	OriginOS 5