How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Phones
  3. Energizer E29
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Energizer E29

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the E29 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Energizer E29
Energizer · 2023
E29
2.8″Unisoc 6531E1,700 mAh
approx. price≈ $20
3.5

Alternatives to the E29

Nokia 130 (2023)
1
Nokia · 2023130 (2023)
3.5
Same price ≈ $20
  • Pixel density 167 ppi vs 143 ppi
  • Thickness 14 mm vs 15.6 mm
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,700 mAh
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.8″
HMD 105 4G
2
HMD · 2024105 4G
3.5
Same price ≈ $20
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 2.1
  • Pixel density 167 ppi vs 143 ppi
  • Thickness 10.4 mm vs 15.6 mm
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,700 mAh
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.8″
TCL OneTouch 4042s
3
TCL · 2024OneTouch 4042s
3.6
Same price ≈ $20
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 2.1
  • Thickness 13.6 mm vs 15.6 mm
  • Battery capacity 1,500 mAh vs 1,700 mAh
  • 3.5 mm headphone jack
Energizer E20+
4
Energizer · 2023E20+
Same price ≈ $20
  • Pixel density 167 ppi vs 143 ppi
  • Bluetooth 3 vs 2.1
  • Screen-to-body ratio 32.3% vs 28.2%
  • Battery capacity 1,000 mAh vs 1,700 mAh
  • 3.5 mm headphone jack
Energizer E244s
5
Energizer · 2024E244s
3.8
Same price ≈ $20
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 2.1
  • Pixel density 167 ppi vs 143 ppi
  • Thickness 12 mm vs 15.6 mm
  • Battery capacity 1,400 mAh vs 1,700 mAh
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.8″
Energizer E242s+
6
Energizer · 2024E242s+
3.7
45% pricier ≈ $30
  • Battery capacity 2,000 mAh vs 1,700 mAh
  • CPU cores 4 vs 1
  • Pixel density 167 ppi vs 143 ppi
  • Dual SIM
  • Screen size 2.4″ vs 2.8″
Nokia C02
8
Nokia · 2023C02
3.8
  • Battery capacity 3,000 mAh vs 1,700 mAh
  • Pixel density 295 ppi vs 143 ppi
  • Screen size 5.4″ vs 2.8″
Energizer E288s
9
Energizer · 2024E288s
3.9
  • Battery capacity 2,000 mAh vs 1,700 mAh
  • CPU cores 4 vs 1
  • Bluetooth 4.2 vs 2.1
Nokia 220 4G (2024)
10
Nokia · 2024220 4G (2024)
3.5
95% pricier ≈ $45
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 2.1
  • Thickness 11.6 mm vs 15.6 mm
  • Screen-to-body ratio 35.2% vs 28.2%
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,700 mAh
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare