- dotrising.com
- Compare
- E20+ vs E29
Energizer E20+ vs Energizer E29
What E20+ does better (3) and where E29 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E20+E29
| E20+ | E29 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 105 mm | 137.6 mm | −32.6 mm |
| Width | 52.6 mm | 62.5 mm | −9.9 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 15.6 mm | +4.3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E20+ better than E29?
- Pixel density167 ppi vs 143 ppi+17%
- Bluetooth3 vs 2.1+43%
- Screen-to-body ratio32.3% vs 28.2%+15%
Why is E29 better than E20+?
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,700 mAh+70%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · E20+: Yes
- Screen size2.4″ vs 2.8″+17%
- Thickness19.9 mm vs 15.6 mm+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 15.6 mm |
| Height | 105 mm | 137.6 mm |
| Width | 52.6 mm | 62.5 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.4″ | 2.8″ |
| Panel | TFT | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 320 px |
| Pixel density | 167 ppi | 143 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 32.3% | 28.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6261D | Unisoc 6531E |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | 1 | 1 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 3 | 2.1 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | ThreadX |
| Platform | — | Other |
