How we score Blog Advertise
  1. dotrising.com
  2. Phones
  3. Crosscall CORE-S5
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Crosscall CORE-S5

10 smartphones at a similar price that compete with the CORE-S5 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Crosscall CORE-S5
Crosscall · 2024
CORE-S5
2.4″Unisoc T1271,800 mAh2 MP
approx. price≈ $80
3.8

Alternatives to the CORE-S5

Sonim XP100
2
Sonim · 2024XP100
3.9
13% cheaper ≈ $70
  • Weight 165 g vs 146 g
  • Thickness 16.2 mm vs 14.7 mm
Gigaset GLX8
3
Gigaset · 2025GLX8
3.9
5% cheaper ≈ $75
  • Battery capacity 2,500 mAh vs 1,800 mAh
  • Weight 169 g vs 146 g
  • Thickness 20 mm vs 14.7 mm
TCL Classic
4
TCL · 2024Classic
3.5
5% cheaper ≈ $75
  • Battery capacity 1,850 mAh vs 1,800 mAh
  • CPU cores 4 vs 1
  • Screen-to-body ratio 40.7% vs 20.5%
  • Peak brightness 330 nits vs 400 nits
  • Dual SIM
Nokia 230 (2024)
5
Nokia · 2024230 (2024)
3.6
5% cheaper ≈ $75
  • Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
  • Screen-to-body ratio 36.5% vs 20.5%
  • Thickness 10.9 mm vs 14.7 mm
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,800 mAh
  • Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
Nokia 235 4G (2024)
6
Nokia · 2024235 4G (2024)
3.6
11% cheaper ≈ $70
  • Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
  • Screen-to-body ratio 35.2% vs 20.5%
  • Thickness 11.6 mm vs 14.7 mm
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,800 mAh
  • Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
Gigaset GLX8 Active Duo
7
Gigaset · 2025GLX8 Active Duo
3.9
7% pricier ≈ $85
  • Battery capacity 2,500 mAh vs 1,800 mAh
  • Weight 169 g vs 146 g
  • Thickness 20 mm vs 14.7 mm
AGM M9F Floating
8
AGM · 2024M9F Floating
4.4
10% cheaper ≈ $70
  • Weight 126 g vs 146 g
  • Battery capacity 1,000 mAh vs 1,800 mAh
  • Thickness 16.5 mm vs 14.7 mm
Nokia 6310 (2024)
9
Nokia · 20246310 (2024)
3.5
5% cheaper ≈ $75
  • Screen size 2.8″ vs 2.4″
  • Screen-to-body ratio 32% vs 20.5%
  • Thickness 14.1 mm vs 14.7 mm
  • Battery capacity 1,450 mAh vs 1,800 mAh
  • Pixel density 143 ppi vs 167 ppi
Gigaset GLX8 Plus
10
Gigaset · 2026GLX8 Plus
3.9
4% pricier ≈ $85
  • Battery capacity 2,500 mAh vs 1,800 mAh
  • Weight 169 g vs 146 g
  • Thickness 20 mm vs 14.7 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare