- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Redmi K40 Gaming vs Redmi K50 Gaming
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming vs Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
What Redmi K40 Gaming does better (4) and where Redmi K50 Gaming wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.4
7.2Camera8.0
8.0Battery6.8
6.9Features9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Redmi K40 GamingRedmi K50 Gaming
| Redmi K40 Gaming | Redmi K50 Gaming | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.9 mm | 162.5 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 76.7 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 210 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Redmi K40 Gaming better than Redmi K50 Gaming?
- Battery capacity5,065 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+8%
- Weight205 g vs 210 g+2%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 8.5 mm+2%
Why is Redmi K50 Gaming better than Redmi K40 Gaming?
- Wired charging67 W vs 120 W+79%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 800 nits+60%
- Charged in 30 min71% vs 176%2.5×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 20 MP+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 161.9 mm | 162.5 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Silver, Bruce Lee Yellow | Black, Gray, Blue, AMG |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | OLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3% | 86.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,065 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 71% | 176% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MIUI 12.5 | MIUI 13 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsXiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming
7.78.0
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K40 GamingvsSony Xperia 5 III
8.08.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K40 GamingvsRealme GT Neo
8.08.1
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K40 GamingvsRealme GT Neo2T
8.08.1
vs
Apple iPhone 14 Pro MaxvsXiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
8.68.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi K50 GamingvsInfinix Zero Ultra
8.48.4