- dotrising.com
- Compare
- V25e vs Poco X4 Pro 5G
Vivo V25e vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
What V25e does better (10) and where Poco X4 Pro 5G wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display8.0
8.0Camera7.1
4.8Battery7.2
4.5Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
V25ePoco X4 Pro 5G
| V25e | Poco X4 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.2 mm | 164.2 mm | −5 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 76.1 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 205 g | −22 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V25e better than Poco X4 Pro 5G?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Poco X4 Pro 5G: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight183 g vs 205 g+12%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,200 nits+8%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.1 mm+4%
Why is Poco X4 Pro 5G better than V25e?
- Main camera64 MP vs 108 MP+69%
- Wired charging44 W vs 67 W+52%
- 5GNo · V25e: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · V25e: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · V25e: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · V25e: Yes
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Charged in 30 min58% vs 95%+64%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 159.2 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Diamond Black, Sunrise Gold | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,404 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 748 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 335,353 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,063 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 358 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 58% | 95% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.6 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 12 | MIUI 13 for POCO |
