- dotrising.com
- Compare
- V25e vs 11i HyperCharge 5G
Vivo V25e vs Xiaomi 11i HyperCharge 5G
What V25e does better (10) and where 11i HyperCharge 5G wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display8.0
8.0Camera7.4
4.8Battery6.6
4.5Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
V25e11i HyperCharge 5G
| V25e | 11i HyperCharge 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.2 mm | 163.7 mm | −4.5 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 76.2 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 183 g | 204 g | −21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V25e better than 11i HyperCharge 5G?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · 11i HyperCharge 5G: No
- NFCYes · 11i HyperCharge 5G: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Weight183 g vs 204 g+11%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,200 nits+8%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.3 mm+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is 11i HyperCharge 5G better than V25e?
- Wired charging44 W vs 120 W2.7×
- Main camera64 MP vs 108 MP+69%
- 5GNo · V25e: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · V25e: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Charged in 30 min58% vs 200%3.4×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · V25e: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · V25e: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+14%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 183 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 159.2 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 74.2 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Diamond Black, Sunrise Gold | Camo Green, Stealth Black, Purple Mist, Pacific Pearl |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,404 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 86.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 920 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 375,528 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,225 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.52" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 44 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 58% | 200% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.82 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 12 | MIUI 13 |
