- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Camon Slim vs Pova 7 Ultra
Tecno Camon Slim vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
What Camon Slim does better (7) and where Pova 7 Ultra wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display9.6
5.9Performance8.0
8.2Camera7.8
8.3Battery9.1
8.0Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon SlimPova 7 Ultra
| Camon Slim | Pova 7 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.6 mm | 160 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 75.2 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 6.4 mm | 8.9 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Weight | 171 g | 201 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon Slim better than Pova 7 Ultra?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 7 Ultra: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 13 MP2.5×
- Memory card slotYes · Pova 7 Ultra: No
- eSIMYes · Pova 7 Ultra: No
- Weight171 g vs 201 g+18%
- Thickness6.4 mm vs 8.9 mm+39%
Why is Pova 7 Ultra better than Camon Slim?
- AnTuTu score831,785 vs 1,771,4442.1×
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Wired charging45 W vs 70 W+56%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Wireless chargingNo · Camon Slim: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,950 vs 3,914+33%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+34%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Camon Slim: Yes
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 460 ppi+7%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Resolution (width)1,208 px vs 1,260 px+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 171 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 6.4 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 162.6 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Matisse Black, Van Gogh Blue, Burgundy Red | Geek White, Geek Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2% | 89.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300e | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G610 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 831,785 | 1,771,444 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,950 | 3,914 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 83% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16.3 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
