- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Camon 50 Pro vs Poco X8s
Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X8s
What Camon 50 Pro does better (8) and where Poco X8s wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Display8.1
7.2Performance7.8
9.1Camera8.6
8.5Battery9.3
7.4Features9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 50 ProPoco X8s
| Camon 50 Pro | Poco X8s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 151.1 mm | +11.3 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 71.8 mm | +5.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 175 g | 187 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 50 Pro better than Poco X8s?
- Battery capacity6,500 mAh vs 6,330 mAh+3%
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Memory card slotYes · Poco X8s: No
- Optical zoom3× vs 2.5×+20%
- Weight175 g vs 187 g+7%
- Screen size6.8″ vs 6.4″+7%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8.1 mm+4%
Why is Poco X8s better than Camon 50 Pro?
- Wired charging45 W vs 100 W2.2×
- AnTuTu score1,059,715 vs 1,464,882+38%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,199 vs 4,110+28%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- eSIMNo · Camon 50 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+8%
- Pixel density429 ppi vs 460 ppi+7%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 6E+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 151.1 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 71.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Xiaomi Shield Glass |
| Colours | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Misty Purple | White, Blue, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,208 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,644 px | 2,656 px |
| Pixel density | 429 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 3,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 91% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 722 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,059,715 | 1,464,882 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,199 | 4,110 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2.5× |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 6,330 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 100 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 16 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
