- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy S26 vs Camon 50 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro
What Galaxy S26 does better (13) and where Camon 50 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display9.7
9.1Performance7.2
9.2Camera9.1
5.4Battery8.6
9.7Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S26Camon 50 Pro
| Galaxy S26 | Camon 50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 149.6 mm | 162.4 mm | −12.8 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 77 mm | −5.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 167 g | 175 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S26 better than Camon 50 Pro?
- AnTuTu score2,441,481 vs 1,059,7152.3×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)10,824 vs 3,1993.4×
- Major OS updates promised7 vs 32.3×
- Wireless chargingYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- CPU frequency4.74 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+82%
- Max video8K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 4+75%
- Weight167 g vs 175 g+5%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
Why is Camon 50 Pro better than Galaxy S26?
- Battery capacity4,300 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+51%
- Wired charging25 W vs 45 W+80%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Galaxy S26: Yes
- Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+8%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 429 ppi+4%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,208 px+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 167 g | 175 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 149.6 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 71.7 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Cobalt Violet, Sky Blue, Black, White, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Misty Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.3″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,383 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-1-AD Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - US/CA/CN | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.74 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 840 - US/CA/CN Xclipse 960 - ROW | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,441,481 | 1,059,715 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 10,824 | 3,199 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,230 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4. | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,300 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Active use (test) | 15.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.21 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S25
9.18.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsSamsung Galaxy S24
9.18.7
vs
Motorola Edge 70 FusionvsSamsung Galaxy S26
9.19.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone (4a) Pro
9.19.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsNothing Phone Pro
9.19.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsXiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
9.19.3


