- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Flip 3 vs Phantom V Flip2
TCL Flip 3 vs Tecno Phantom V Flip2
What Flip 3 does better (4) and where Phantom V Flip2 wins (23) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Display6.0
3.0Camera5.2
2.2Battery6.2
2.5Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Flip 3Phantom V Flip2
| Flip 3 | Phantom V Flip2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 107.2 mm | 170.8 mm | −63.6 mm |
| Width | 59.4 mm | 73.4 mm | −14 mm |
| Thickness | 19.8 mm | 7.6 mm | +12.2 mm |
| Weight | 144 g | 196 g | −52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flip 3 better than Phantom V Flip2?
- Weight144 g vs 196 g+37%
- Memory card slotYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.1 LUFS vs -26.6 LUFS+-6%
Why is Phantom V Flip2 better than Flip 3?
- Battery capacity1,850 mAh vs 4,720 mAh2.6×
- RAM1 GB vs 8 GB8×
- Main camera5 MP vs 50 MP10×
- Wired charging5 W vs 70 W14×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Pixel density125 ppi vs 413 ppi3.3×
- Storage (max)16 GB vs 256 GB16×
- Screen size3.2″ vs 6.9″2.2×
- OLED panelNo · Flip 3: Yes
- CPU frequency1.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Flip 3: Yes
- NFCNo · Flip 3: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 144 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 19.8 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 107.2 mm | 170.8 mm |
| Width | 59.4 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Colours | Black | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 3.2″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 125 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 893 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 49.8% | 85.9% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 308 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 775,306 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,544 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,247 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 16 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 16 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 5 MP | 50 MP |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | — | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,850 mAh | 4,720 mAh |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | 5 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.36 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | KaiOS 3.1 | Android 14 |
| Platform | iOS | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
6.45.7
vs
nubia Flip 2vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
5.25.7
vs
nubia FlipvsTecno Phantom V Flip2
4.85.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
5.55.7
vs
Motorola Razr 40 UltravsTecno Phantom V Flip2
5.05.7
vs
Motorola Razr 40vsTecno Phantom V Flip2
4.75.7


