- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy S26 FE vs Camon 50 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S26 FE vs Tecno Camon 50 Pro
What Galaxy S26 FE does better (12) and where Camon 50 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display9.7
8.4Performance7.2
9.3Camera9.1
6.7Battery8.6
9.7Features7.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S26 FECamon 50 Pro
| Galaxy S26 FE | Camon 50 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 162.4 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 77 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 193 g | 175 g | +18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S26 FE better than Camon 50 Pro?
- AnTuTu score2,119,022 vs 1,059,715+100%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,035 vs 3,1992.5×
- Major OS updates promised7 vs 32.3×
- Wireless chargingYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- CPU frequency3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+27%
- Max video8K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- eSIMYes · Camon 50 Pro: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 4+62%
- Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
- CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 7.8 mm+5%
Why is Camon 50 Pro better than Galaxy S26 FE?
- Battery capacity4,900 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+33%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Galaxy S26 FE: Yes
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 429 ppi+11%
- Weight193 g vs 175 g+10%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,208 px+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 193 g | 175 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 76.9 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Colours | Blueberry, Graphite, Pistachio | Moonshadow Black, Cypress Green, Nebula Titanium, Misty Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,900 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,268 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.7% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 2500 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 10 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Xclipse 950 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,119,022 | 1,059,715 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,035 | 3,199 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,275 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,900 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Active use (test) | 14.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 69% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.5 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 3 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 50 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S26vsTecno Camon 50 Pro
9.19.1
vs
Xiaomi Poco X8 ProvsTecno Camon 50 Pro
9.29.1
vs
Tecno Camon 50 ProvsInfinix Note 60 Pro
9.19.1
vs
Motorola Edge 70 FusionvsTecno Camon 50 Pro
9.19.1
vs
Nothing Phone (4a) ProvsTecno Camon 50 Pro
9.29.1
vs
Nothing Phone ProvsTecno Camon 50 Pro
9.39.1


