- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy S20 vs T909c
Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Tel.Me. T909c
What Galaxy S20 does better (8) and where T909c wins (1) — every spec side by side.
7.7Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S20T909c
| Galaxy S20 | T909c | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 151.7 mm | 129 mm | +22.7 mm |
| Width | 69.1 mm | 44 mm | +25.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 18 mm | −10.1 mm |
| Weight | 163 g | 80 g | +83 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S20 better than T909c?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 600 mAh6.7×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909c: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909c: No
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 18 mm2.3×
- Memory card slotYes · T909c: No
- eSIMYes · T909c: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909c: No
Why is T909c better than Galaxy S20?
- Weight163 g vs 80 g2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 163 g | 80 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 151.7 mm | 129 mm |
| Width | 69.1 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | — |
| Colours | Cosmic Grey, Cloud Blue, Cloud Pink, Cloud White, Aura Red | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.2″ | — |
| Panel | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | — |
| Pixel density | 563 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 814 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 990 - Global | — |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | — |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MP11 - Global Adreno 650 - USA | — |
| AnTuTu score | 525,029 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 12,557 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,414 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 12 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | — |
| Optical zoom | 1.1× | — |
| Max video | 8K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | — |
| USB version | 3.2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | — |
| SAR (head) | 0.28 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 5GvsSamsung Galaxy S20
7.97.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S20vsSamsung Galaxy S22 5G
7.88.3
vs
Apple iPhone 12 Pro MaxvsSamsung Galaxy S20
7.87.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S20
9.57.8
vs
Apple iPhone 15 Pro MaxvsSamsung Galaxy S20
9.07.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy S20vsSamsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G
7.88.6