- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M34 5G vs nubia Focus Pro
Samsung Galaxy M34 5G vs ZTE nubia Focus Pro
What Galaxy M34 5G does better (8) and where nubia Focus Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display6.9
8.0Camera8.8
7.5Battery6.0
6.7Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M34 5Gnubia Focus Pro
| Galaxy M34 5G | nubia Focus Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.7 mm | 166 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 76.1 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 222 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M34 5G better than nubia Focus Pro?
- OLED panelYes · nubia Focus Pro: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Memory card slotYes · nubia Focus Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · nubia Focus Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Weight208 g vs 222 g+7%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
Why is nubia Focus Pro better than Galaxy M34 5G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.1% vs 86.3%+4%
- Thickness8.8 mm vs 8.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 222 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 161.7 mm | 166 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Midnight Blue, Prism Silver, Waterfall Blue | Black, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 885 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.1% | 86.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 | Unisoc T760 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Unisoc |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Mali-G57 |
| AnTuTu score | 603,449 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,104 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 45% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.89 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 ProvsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G
8.07.9
vs
Google Pixel 7avsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G
8.07.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy M35vsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G
8.37.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy M15vsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G
7.17.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy M55vsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G
8.57.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy M34 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M33
7.96.7