- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy M34 5G vs Hi Enjoy 60s
Samsung Galaxy M34 5G vs Wiko Hi Enjoy 60s
What Galaxy M34 5G does better (16) and where Hi Enjoy 60s wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display4.0
8.0Camera3.4
7.5Battery7.4
6.7Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M34 5GHi Enjoy 60s
| Galaxy M34 5G | Hi Enjoy 60s | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.7 mm | 168.3 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 77.7 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 9 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 208 g | 199 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M34 5G better than Hi Enjoy 60s?
- Main camera50 MP vs 13 MP3.8×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · Hi Enjoy 60s: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Hi Enjoy 60s: No
- NFCYes · Hi Enjoy 60s: No
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 260 ppi+52%
- Wired charging25 W vs 22 W+11%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Hi Enjoy 60s: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Hi Enjoy 60s better than Galaxy M34 5G?
- Weight208 g vs 199 g+5%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 161.7 mm | 168.3 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 77.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Midnight Blue, Prism Silver, Waterfall Blue | Black, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 885 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.1% | 84.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 603,449 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,104 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 45% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.89 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | HarmonyOS 3.0 |
| Platform | Android | HarmonyOS |
| Interface | One UI 8 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 ProvsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G
8.07.9
vs
Google Pixel 7avsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G
8.07.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy M35vsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G
8.37.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy M15vsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G
7.17.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy M55vsSamsung Galaxy M34 5G
8.57.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy M34 5GvsSamsung Galaxy M33
7.96.7