- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A25 vs T-Phone Pro
Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Telekom T-Phone Pro
What Galaxy A25 does better (13) and where T-Phone Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display5.3
8.0Camera6.6
3.1Battery5.4
8.0Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A25T-Phone Pro
| Galaxy A25 | T-Phone Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 174 mm | −13 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 78 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 214 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A25 better than T-Phone Pro?
- Wired charging25 W vs 15 W+67%
- OLED panelYes · T-Phone Pro: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · T-Phone Pro: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 263 ppi+51%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Weight197 g vs 214 g+9%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 9 mm+8%
Why is T-Phone Pro better than Galaxy A25?
- Wireless chargingNo · Galaxy A25: Yes
- Rear cameras2 vs 42×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 174 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 78 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,030 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Mediatek |
| Process | 5 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Mali G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 443,234 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,023 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 643 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 10.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 49% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | 0.46 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
