- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A25 vs T909
Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Tel.Me. T909
What Galaxy A25 does better (8) and where T909 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
7.5Display3.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A25T909
| Galaxy A25 | T909 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161 mm | 109 mm | +52 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 44 mm | +32.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 22 mm | −13.7 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 95 g | +102 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A25 better than T909?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 600 mAh8.3×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- OLED panelYes · T909: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T909: No
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 22 mm2.7×
- Memory card slotYes · T909: No
- Dual SIMYes · T909: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · T909: No
Why is T909 better than Galaxy A25?
- Weight197 g vs 95 g2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 95 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 22 mm |
| Height | 161 mm | 109 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 44 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue | 3 - Silver/ Grey, Grey/Silver, Silver/Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | — |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Monochrome graphic |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | — |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,030 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 | — |
| Chip maker | Exynos | — |
| Process | 5 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 443,234 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,023 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 643 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | — |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | — |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | — |
| Telephoto camera | No | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | — |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 10.3 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 49% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | — |
| SAR (head) | 0.46 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
