- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs Blade V40
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs ZTE Blade V40
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (12) and where Blade V40 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display4.6
7.8Camera3.9
5.3Battery7.4
5.7Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GBlade V40
| Galaxy A24 4G | Blade V40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 165.7 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.7 mm | −1.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Blade V40?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Blade V40: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Blade V40: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Wired charging25 W vs 22 W+11%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V40: No
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 9.7 mm+17%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
Why is Blade V40 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- 5GNo · Galaxy A24 4G: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.7 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 83.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | MyOS 11 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsSamsung Galaxy F14
6.86.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0


