- dotrising.com
- Compare
- Galaxy A24 4G vs Galaxy F14
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G vs Samsung Galaxy F14
What Galaxy A24 4G does better (9) and where Galaxy F14 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.6
7.8Camera5.2
5.3Battery7.5
5.7Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A24 4GGalaxy F14
| Galaxy A24 4G | Galaxy F14 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.1 mm | 166.8 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.2 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.4 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 206 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A24 4G better than Galaxy F14?
- OLED panelYes · Galaxy F14: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy F14: No
- NFCYes · Galaxy F14: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Galaxy F14: No
- Weight195 g vs 206 g+6%
- Thickness8.3 mm vs 9.4 mm+13%
Why is Galaxy F14 better than Galaxy A24 4G?
- 5GNo · Galaxy A24 4G: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Process6 nm vs 5 nm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 9.4 mm |
| Height | 162.1 mm | 166.8 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red | Black, Green, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,012 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.4% | 81.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 398,005 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,890 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 344 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 46% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.9 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | 0.69 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | One UI Core 5.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A53 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
7.46.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsInfinix Note 30 Pro
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A13vsSamsung Galaxy A24 4G
4.86.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTecno Camon 20 Pro
6.86.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsOnePlus Nord N30
6.87.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy A24 4GvsTel.Me. T909


